Most science communication starts at the wrong place. A deliverable is already in mind, a format already chosen, an audience assumption never tested. We start earlier. Every engagement begins with one strategic conversation: what does this audience need to believe, and what stands in the way?
The model is iterative. Phases inform and revisit one another as the science and the audience sharpen the brief. Think of it as a methods map rather than a flowchart.
We start with the deck, then the papers, so we know the science the way the scientists do. Then we find the barrier: what the last investor room didn't believe. We build the argument before the storyboard. It doesn't woo with cinematics. It teaches the room what it needs to see, fast, with craft built around the case. Our animation is not a picture of the science. It is the argument for it.
We start with the misunderstanding: what patients, caregivers, and clinicians believe today, and what has to change for them to act. We map that belief shift before a single asset is designed. First the strategy: which audiences, which moments, which channels carry the activation. Then the visual language, then the assets. Awareness is a strategy problem before it is a production one.
We use AI tools in our pipeline for research synthesis, animation post-processing, and workflow acceleration. We do not use AI to generate final scientific or medical content.
The science in every illustration, animation, and infographic we produce was built by a human who understands it. Scientific accuracy requires nothing less.